Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and servers) on. Learn more
114 Highlights 49 Differences 3 Reactions 0 Likes
Anker 747 vs Anker Prime 27K: 114 Highlights & 49 Differences — So, Which Power Bank Actually Works Better
Explore the differences in battery, charging power, and smart features to pick the best power bank for you. We pitted Anker 747 and Anker Prime 27K head to head. Compare core features, input port count, usb-c input, maximum output power & low-power device mode, and tech perks in this deep-dive.
Cycle Life Rating: 500–800 Cycles Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation. with 25 points higher
Has 7 Cells Shows the number of battery cells inside the power bank. with 9 points higher
1.27 inch slimmer depth Measures the front-to-back thickness of the power bank. 1.96 inch vs 3.23 inch
0.19 lbs lighter weight Indicates how heavy the power bank is for portability. 1.46 lbs vs 1.65 lbs
Build Materials & Durability
Reinforced Ports Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan. with a difference of 6 points
Button Durability Rated Very Good Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage. with 35 points higher
Scratch Resistant Indicates whether the exterior surface is resistant to scratches from daily handling and transport. with a difference of 46 points
Uses Fire Retardant Material Indicates use of flame-resistant materials in construction. with a difference of 6 points
Heat Resistant Indicates whether the power bank is designed to withstand elevated internal and external temperatures without performance degradation. with a difference of 6 points
Cycle Life Rating: 500–800 Cycles Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation. with 25 points higher
Has 7 Cells Shows the number of battery cells inside the power bank. with 9 points higher
1.27 inch slimmer depth Measures the front-to-back thickness of the power bank. 1.96 inch vs 3.23 inch
0.19 lbs lighter weight Indicates how heavy the power bank is for portability. 1.46 lbs vs 1.65 lbs
Build Materials & Durability
Reinforced Ports Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan. with a difference of 6 points
Button Durability Rated Very Good Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage. with 35 points higher
Scratch Resistant Indicates whether the exterior surface is resistant to scratches from daily handling and transport. with a difference of 46 points
Uses Fire Retardant Material Indicates use of flame-resistant materials in construction. with a difference of 6 points
Heat Resistant Indicates whether the power bank is designed to withstand elevated internal and external temperatures without performance degradation. with a difference of 6 points
Features Internal Heat Sink Indicates the presence of an internal heat sink to absorb and spread heat. with a difference of 6 points
Has 4 Thermal Sensors Specifies how many thermal sensors are used for temperature monitoring. with 55 points higher
Supports Thermal Throttling Reduces power output automatically to prevent overheating. with a difference of 6 points
Cooling Design Type: Passive Cooling Describes the overall cooling architecture used to manage internal heat during charging and discharging. with 5 points higher
Anker 747 vs Anker Prime Power Banks: Which Portable Charger Takes the Lead?
When it comes to portable power solutions, Anker 747 and Anker Prime stand out as two compelling options, designed to keep your devices charged on the go. Both power banks cater to charging smartphones, tablets, and laptops, with safety and reliability being paramount, featuring lithium-ion batteries with robust protection systems and multiple output ports. However, they differ significantly in size, charging capacity, smart features, and price. The Anker 747, launched in 2020, leans on a traditional aluminum shell and stable output power, while the newer Anker Prime (2023) streamlines portability with enhanced battery capacity, faster input rates, smart connectivity, and a lighter build offering more versatility for modern tech users.
Power and Precision: The Strengths of Anker 747
Starting with the Anker 747's battery capacity of 25,600 mAh and a higher nominal voltage of 14.8V, this power bank offers a metal frame and an aluminum outer shell that gives it a sturdy, premium feel, appealing to users who prefer a rugged build. Its maximum output power of 87W delivered through four output ports allows charging multiple devices simultaneously, albeit at a lower wattage compared to Anker Prime. Featuring USB Power Delivery and Quick Charge support, it ensures compatibility with a broad range of devices like laptops and smartphones.
In terms of safety, the 747 packs standard protections, including thermal protection and surge safeguards with certified compliance to UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS standards; all housed within a design that manages heat through passive cooling, including a metal chassis and a heat spread layer. The single thermal sensor helps keep temperature regulation in check, and the device offers a clear LED indicator for battery level. However, it lacks a remaining time display or app notifications. For users appreciating classic tactile controls, the physical button setup responds reliably, complementing its straightforward user interface.
Though on the higher end of price at $199.99 at Anker.com, the 747 remains a compelling choice for users valuing build quality and consistent power delivery without the bells and whistles of smart features or app connectivity.
Compact Powerhouse: Why Anker Prime Is a Modern Favorite
By contrast, the Anker Prime offers a substantial upgrade in battery size with a 27,650 mAh capacity, paired with an 11.4V multi-cell configuration designed for efficient power distribution. Despite its larger capacity, the Prime is impressively lighter at 1.46 lbs and sports a compact footprint (2.24" W x 1.96" D x 6.37" H), making it pocket-friendly and travel-ready. The blend of plastic and aluminum materials lends it durability while keeping weight down, with added scratch resistance and very good button durability.
Where the Prime shines is in its charging capabilities. Supporting up to 140W input power with dual USB-C inputs, it enables rapid recharge in just about 2.5 hours. On output, it pushes a stunning 250W of power, distributed among three ports, each capable of delivering up to 140W, and including advanced protocols like PPS (Programmable Power Supply). This ensures compatibility and optimized charging with the latest devices, laptops, and even low-current devices, supported also by smart features like auto shut-off and low-power device mode.
Smart integration is a major advantage for the Prime, equipped with Bluetooth connectivity and companion app support that allows users to monitor charging history, receive smart alerts, and even upgrade firmware remotely. This adds a layer of customization and real-time status tracking unmatched by the 747.
The Anker Prime also boasts a higher thermal sensor count (4 versus 1), which provides superior temperature monitoring and helps maintain optimal operation with advanced safety firmware, including fail-safe shutdown mechanisms. Its environmental credentials are also noteworthy, with Energy Star and EPEAT certifications, eco modes, and use of sustainable materials, reflecting a modern focus on energy efficiency.
Adding to its allure, the Anker Prime retails at a far more affordable price of $110.49 at Amazon, bringing flagship charging performance and smart features within reach.
Quick Take
The Anker 747 impresses with its solid metal construction, steady power output, and simplicity, making it ideal for those who prioritize durability and straightforward charging. Meanwhile, the Anker Prime knocks it out of the park with higher capacity, blazing-fast input/output speeds, smart connectivity, and a lightweight design perfect for modern mobile users.
Bottom Line
For anyone looking for a versatile, compact, and intelligent power bank that handles everything from phones to high-power laptops with ease, the Anker Prime is the superior choice. It packs greater battery capacity, faster recharge, comprehensive safety features, and sophisticated app control, all at nearly half the price of the traditional Anker 747. The Anker 747 holds its ground as a durable and reliable option, but ultimately cannot match the performance, portability, and modern features of its younger sibling.
Verdict
Winner: Anker Prime - Delivers top-tier charging power, smart features, portability, and improved safety at a more accessible price.
Runner-up: Anker 747 - Offers a solid build and consistent output suitable for users who prefer a traditional design, though it lacks the latest tech and speed advantages.
The maximum operating temperature for this device is 104°F (40°C), ensuring safe operation within this thermal limit.
Anker Prime 27K
The maximum operating temperature for this power bank is 104 °F (40 °C), ensuring reliable performance in various environmental conditions.
Defines the highest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Maximum, Anker 747 ◉ is same as Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering equal 104.00 °F measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Operating Temperature Maximum on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
42 Anker 747 0Votes Power Bank
47 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Power Bank
Anker 747
This product is classified as a Power Bank, designed to store electrical energy and supply it to other devices.
Identifies the functional category of the portable charging device.
In the battle of Product Type, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Product Type on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
67 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Smartphone Charging, Tablet Charging, Laptop Charging, Travel Backup, Emergency Power
vs Intended Use Case
The Anker 747 is intended for Smartphone Charging, Laptop Charging, and Travel Backup, while the Anker Prime expands its use cases to include Tablet Charging and Emergency Power, offering broader utility.
Describes the primary usage scenarios the power bank is designed for.
In the battle of Intended Use Case, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Intended Use Case on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Finish Type
What type of finish does it have?
52 Anker 747 0Votes Glossy
47 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Matte, Glossy
vs Finish Type
Anker 747 comes with a Glossy finish, while Anker Prime offers both Matte and Glossy options, giving users more choices in aesthetic.
Describes the surface finish of the exterior shell.
In the battle of Finish Type, Anker 747 ◉ is better than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Finish Type on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year
What is the release year?
42 Anker 747 0Votes 2020
72 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes 2023
vs Release Year
The Anker 747 was released in 2020, making it an older model compared to the Anker Prime which was released in 2023, suggesting the Prime incorporates more recent technology.
Indicates the year the product was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 30 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Release Year on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
Where is this product made?
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 747 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
37 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes China
vs Country of Origin
The country of origin is not available for the Anker 747, whereas the Anker Prime is specified to be from China.
States the country where the product is manufactured or assembled.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Country of Origin on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What color options are available?
63 Anker 747 0Votes Black
76 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Black
Lists the available exterior color choices.
In the battle of Color Options, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 13 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Color Options on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Rugged Design
Does it have a rugged design?
No 0Votes Anker 747
No 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Indicates whether the power bank is built for enhanced durability.
In the battle of Rugged Design, Anker 747 ◉ is same as Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Rugged Design on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Waterproof Rating
What is the waterproof rating?
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 747 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Anker Prime 27K (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Shows the level of water resistance certification.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Waterproof Rating on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Dustproof Rating
What is the dustproof rating?
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 747 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Anker Prime 27K (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates protection against dust ingress.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dustproof Rating on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Minimum
What is the minimum operating temperature?
32 °F 0Votes
32 °F 0Votes
Defines the lowest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Minimum, Anker 747 ◉ is same as Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering equal 32.00 °F measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Operating Temperature Minimum on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
32 Anker 747 0Votes 32-113°F
37 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes 32-113°F
Specifies safe temperature conditions for storing the power bank when not in use.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Range, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Storage Temperature Range on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Overcharge Protection, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overcharge Protection on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Cell Type
What type of battery cell does it use?
22 Anker 747 0Votes Lithium-ion
77 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Cylindrical
vs Battery Cell Type
The Anker 747 uses a Lithium-ion battery cell type, distinct from the Anker Prime which uses a Cylindrical battery cell type, indicating a difference in internal battery construction.
Indicates the physical form factor of the battery cells used.
In the battle of Battery Cell Type, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 55 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Battery Cell Type on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Chemistry
What battery chemistry is used?
62 Anker 747 0Votes Lithium-Ion
67 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Lithium-Ion
Anker Prime 27K
The power bank utilizes Lithium-Ion battery chemistry, known for its high energy density and long cycle life.
Defines the chemical composition of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Chemistry, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Battery Chemistry on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Configuration
What is the battery configuration?
77 Anker 747 0Votes Series‑Parallel Configuration
67 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Multi Cell
Anker Prime 27K
The power bank employs a Multi Cell battery configuration, which allows for higher capacity and more flexible power output.
Describes how battery cells are electrically arranged to achieve desired voltage and capacity.
In the battle of Battery Configuration, Anker 747 ◉ is better than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering higher 10 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Battery Configuration on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Overdischarge Protection
Is overdischarge protection supported?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Anker 747
The power bank is equipped with overdischarge protection, preventing the battery from being drained too low, which can extend its lifespan.
Prevents battery depletion below safe voltage levels.
In the battle of Overdischarge Protection, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overdischarge Protection on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
25,600 mAh 0Votes
27,650 mAh 1Votes
vs Battery Capacity
Anker 747 has a battery capacity of 25600 mAh, which is slightly less than Anker Prime's 27650 mAh, providing Anker Prime with a longer charge duration.
States the total energy storage capacity of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Capacity, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 2,050.0 mAh measurement.
Based on community votes for Battery Capacity, Anker 747 ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Anker Prime 27K ◉, which got 1 votes.
The Anker Prime clearly has more juice with its higher battery capacity. That's a big plus for longer trips, tbh.
See more
Energy Rating
What is the energy rating?
94.7 Watt 0Votes
250 Watt 0Votes
vs Energy Rating
The Anker 747 has an energy rating of 94.7 Watt, significantly lower than Anker Prime's 250 Watt, allowing Anker Prime to deliver substantially more power.
Measures total energy stored expressed in watt-hours.
In the battle of Energy Rating, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 155.3 Watt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Energy Rating on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Cell Count
How many battery cells are used?
38 Anker 747 0Votes 6
47 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes 7
vs Cell Count
Anker 747 contains 6 battery cells, whereas Anker Prime features 7 cells, contributing to its higher overall capacity and performance.
Shows the number of battery cells inside the power bank.
In the battle of Cell Count, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 9 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cell Count on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Voltage
What is the battery voltage?
14.8 Volt 0Votes
11.4 Volt 0Votes
vs Battery Voltage
The Anker 747 operates at 14.8 Volt, which is higher than Anker Prime's 11.4 Volt battery voltage.
Indicates the nominal voltage of the battery pack.
In the battle of Battery Voltage, Anker 747 ◉ is better than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering higher 3.4 Volt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Battery Voltage on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Cycle Life Rating
What is the cycle life rating?
22 Anker 747 0Votes 300–500 Cycles
47 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes 500–800 Cycles
vs Cycle Life Rating
Anker 747's battery has a cycle life rating of 300–500 Cycles, while Anker Prime offers a superior 500–800 Cycles, suggesting greater long-term durability for the Prime.
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
In the battle of Cycle Life Rating, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 25 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cycle Life Rating on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Self-Discharge Rate
What is the self-discharge rate?
3 % 0Votes
3 % 0Votes
Indicates how much charge is lost when not in use.
In the battle of Self-Discharge Rate, Anker 747 ◉ is same as Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering equal 3.00 % measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Self-Discharge Rate on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Loss
How much power is lost in standby?
0.2 Watt 0Votes
0.5 Watt 0Votes
vs Standby Power Loss
The Anker 747 has a standby power loss of 0.2 Watt, which is lower than Anker Prime's 0.5 Watt, potentially meaning Anker 747 retains charge slightly better when idle.
Measures power lost while the unit is idle.
In the battle of Standby Power Loss, Anker 747 ◉ is better than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 0.3 Watt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Standby Power Loss on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Protection System
Does it include a battery protection system?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Confirms presence of integrated battery protection circuitry.
In the battle of Battery Protection System, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Battery Protection System on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Confirms whether USB-C can be used as a charging input.
In the battle of USB-C Input, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the USB-C Input on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Input Power
What is the maximum input power?
65 Watt 0Votes
140 Watt 0Votes
vs Maximum Input Power
Anker 747's maximum input power is 65 Watt, which is considerably less than Anker Prime's 140 Watt, allowing the Anker Prime to recharge significantly faster.
Shows the maximum power the power bank can accept while charging.
In the battle of Maximum Input Power, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 75.0 Watt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Maximum Input Power on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Input Current Rating
What is the input current rating?
3 Amp 0Votes
3 Amp 0Votes
Anker 747
The input current rating for the power bank is 3 Amp, indicating the maximum current it can draw for recharging.
Anker Prime 27K
It has an input current rating of 3 Amp, supporting efficient power input for faster recharging.
Defines the maximum current the power bank can draw during charging.
In the battle of Input Current Rating, Anker 747 ◉ is same as Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering equal 3.00 Amp measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Input Current Rating on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Time
How long does it take to fully recharge?
2.5 hour 0Votes
2.5 hour 0Votes
Anker 747
The estimated charging time for the power bank is 2.5 hour, allowing for a relatively quick recharge.
Anker Prime 27K
The power bank can be fully recharged in approximately 2.5 hours, offering quick turnaround for its next use.
Estimates total time required to fully recharge the power bank.
In the battle of Charging Time, Anker 747 ◉ is same as Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering equal 2.50 hour measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charging Time on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Input Port Type
What input port types are supported?
82 Anker 747 0Votes USB-C
87 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes USB-C
Identifies the physical port types used to recharge the power bank.
In the battle of Input Port Type, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Input Port Type on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage Range
What input voltage range is supported?
62 Anker 747 0Votes 5–20V
Who knows? 0Votes Anker Prime 27K (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Input Voltage Range
The Anker 747 lists an input voltage range of 5–20V, however, this information is not available for the Anker Prime.
Specifies the supported voltage range for charging input.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Input Voltage Range on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Input Charging
Does it support fast input charging?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Indicates whether fast-charging input standards are supported.
In the battle of Fast Input Charging, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Fast Input Charging on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
vs Pass-Through Charging
Information for pass-through charging is not available for the Anker 747, but the Anker Prime explicitly supports it, enabling simultaneous device and power bank charging.
Allows the power bank to charge devices while being charged itself.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Pass-Through Charging on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Efficiency
What is the charging efficiency?
90 % 0Votes
90 % 0Votes
Measures how efficiently input power is converted to stored energy.
In the battle of Charging Efficiency, Anker 747 ◉ is same as Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering equal 90.00 % measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charging Efficiency on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 747 has a maximum output power of 87 Watt, considerably less than Anker Prime's 140 Watt, giving the Anker Prime greater capability for high-power devices.
Shows the highest power level supported by a single output.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 53.0 Watt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Maximum Output Power on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Information on low-power device mode is not available for Anker 747, but Anker Prime explicitly includes it, ensuring safe charging for small gadgets.
Enables safe charging for small electronics like earbuds.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Low-Power Device Mode on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Total Output Power
What is the total output power?
87 Watt 0Votes
250 Watt 1Votes
vs Total Output Power
Anker 747 provides 87 Watt of total output power, significantly less than Anker Prime's 250 Watt, enabling Anker Prime to power more demanding multi-device setups.
Measures the combined power available when using multiple ports.
In the battle of Total Output Power, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 163.0 Watt measurement.
Based on community votes for Total Output Power, Anker 747 ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Anker Prime 27K ◉, which got 1 votes.
I'm looking at the total output power, and wow, the Anker Prime really crushes it. 250W vs 87W is a huge difference, making it much more versatile.
See more
Output Port Type
What output port types are available?
62 Anker 747 0Votes USB-A, USB-C
67 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes USB-A, USB-C
Anker 747
The power bank is equipped with both USB-A and USB-C output port types, offering versatility for charging various devices.
Identifies the physical ports used to deliver power to devices.
In the battle of Output Port Type, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Port Type on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current Rating
What is the output current rating?
4.35 Watt 0Votes
250 Watt 0Votes
vs Output Current Rating
Anker 747's output current rating is 4.35 Watt, which is much lower than Anker Prime's 250 Watt, indicating a substantial difference in overall power delivery capability.
Represents the power delivery capability under load conditions.
In the battle of Output Current Rating, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 245.7 Watt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Current Rating on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Power Distribution Control
Does it manage power distribution automatically?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Anker 747
The device features power distribution control, allowing it to intelligently manage and allocate power to connected devices for optimal charging.
Ensures balanced power delivery across connected devices.
In the battle of Power Distribution Control, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Distribution Control on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Load Detection
Does it detect connected device load?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Anker 747
The power bank features load detection, allowing it to automatically identify when a device is connected and begin charging.
Automatically detects connected devices to optimize power output.
In the battle of Load Detection, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Load Detection on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Output Port Count
How many output ports does it have?
52 Anker 747 0Votes 4
47 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes 3
vs Output Port Count
The Anker 747 offers 4 output ports, which is one more than Anker Prime's 3 output ports, allowing the Anker 747 to charge more devices simultaneously.
Indicates how many devices can be physically connected at once.
In the battle of Output Port Count, Anker 747 ◉ is better than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Port Count on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Output Voltage Range
What output voltage range is supported?
72 Anker 747 0Votes 5–20V
77 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes 5–20V
Defines the voltage levels supported for device charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage Range, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Voltage Range on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Charging Technology
Which fast charging technologies are supported?
52 Anker 747 0Votes Power Delivery
52 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Power Delivery, PPS
vs Fast Charging Technology
Anker 747 supports Power Delivery, while Anker Prime supports both Power Delivery and PPS, offering more advanced and optimized fast charging capabilities.
Lists supported fast-charging standards.
In the battle of Fast Charging Technology, Anker 747 ◉ is same as Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Fast Charging Technology on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
Can it charge multiple devices simultaneously?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Indicates whether multiple devices can be charged at once.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Simultaneous Device Charging on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Output Stability
How stable is the output power?
32 Anker 747 0Votes Stable
67 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Very Stable
vs Output Stability
Anker 747's output stability is rated as Stable, whereas Anker Prime's is rated as Very Stable, which benefits sensitive electronics.
Describes how consistently the power bank maintains output power under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Output Stability, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 35 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Stability on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation Accuracy
How accurate is the voltage regulation?
42 Anker 747 0Votes Good
77 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Excellent
vs Voltage Regulation Accuracy
The Anker 747 offers Good voltage regulation accuracy, while the Anker Prime boasts Excellent accuracy, providing more consistent and reliable power.
Indicates how precisely the power bank maintains target voltage levels during charging.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation Accuracy, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 35 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Voltage Regulation Accuracy on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it auto shut off when idle?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
vs Auto Shut-Off
The auto shut-off feature is not specified for the Anker 747, but Anker Prime explicitly includes it, enhancing safety and battery life.
Automatically stops output when no device is connected.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Shut-Off on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 747 does not mention protocol auto-detection, but Anker Prime includes it, automatically adjusting charging to suit connected devices.
Automatically selects the best protocol for each device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Protocol Auto-Detection on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Samsung Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Samsung devices?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Anker 747
This power bank is compatible with Samsung charging protocols, ensuring efficient and safe charging for Samsung devices.
Confirms optimized charging for Samsung devices.
In the battle of Samsung Charging Compatibility, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Samsung Charging Compatibility on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Power Supply
Does it support PPS charging?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
vs Programmable Power Supply
Anker 747 does not specify support for Programmable Power Supply (PPS), but Anker Prime explicitly includes it, optimizing fast charging for compatible devices.
Indicates support for Programmable Power Supply charging.
In the battle of Programmable Power Supply, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Programmable Power Supply on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Ensures optimized charging for Apple devices.
In the battle of Apple Charging Compatibility, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Apple Charging Compatibility on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop Charging
Can it charge laptops?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Indicates ability to charge laptops via USB-C output.
In the battle of Laptop Charging, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Laptop Charging on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Tablet Charging
Can it charge tablets?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Confirms reliable charging for tablets and large devices.
In the battle of Tablet Charging, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Tablet Charging on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Device
Does it support wearable devices?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Indicates compatibility with smartwatches and wearables.
In the battle of Wearable Device, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Wearable Device on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Current Device
Does it support low-current devices?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
vs Low-Current Device
Anker 747 does not specify support for low-current devices, whereas Anker Prime explicitly supports them, broadening its compatibility.
Enables safe charging for devices requiring very low current.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Low-Current Device on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Protocol
Does it support multiple protocols?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
vs Multi-Protocol
Anker 747 does not specify multi-protocol support, but Anker Prime confirms it has this capability, allowing for wider device compatibility.
Anker 747 uses Aluminum for its outer shell, whereas Anker Prime uses a combination of Plastic and Aluminum, which could impact its feel and durability.
Specifies the primary material used for the exterior housing.
In the battle of Outer Shell Material, Anker 747 ◉ is better than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering higher 10 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Outer Shell Material on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Impact Resistance Rating
What is the impact resistance rating?
42 Anker 747 0Votes Moderate Impact Resistance
47 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Moderate Impact Resistance
Anker Prime 27K
The power bank has a Moderate Impact Resistance rating, indicating it can withstand typical bumps and minor drops during daily use.
Indicates the ability of the power bank to withstand shocks and physical impacts.
In the battle of Impact Resistance Rating, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Impact Resistance Rating on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance Height
What drop height can it survive?
3 ft 0Votes
3 ft 0Votes
Anker 747
The power bank has a drop resistance height of up to 3 ft (0.91 m), offering some protection against accidental drops.
Specifies the maximum drop height the device can withstand.
In the battle of Drop Resistance Height, Anker 747 ◉ is same as Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering equal 3.00 ft measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Drop Resistance Height on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance
Is the power bank heat resistant?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Anker 747
This power bank offers heat resistance, indicating it can withstand certain thermal conditions without damage or compromised performance.
Indicates whether the power bank is designed to withstand elevated internal and external temperatures without performance degradation.
In the battle of Heat Resistance, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heat Resistance on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Frame Material
What is the internal frame material?
42 Anker 747 0Votes Metal
47 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Metal
Describes the internal structural material supporting the battery cells.
In the battle of Internal Frame Material, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Frame Material on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Retardant Materials
Does it use fire-retardant materials?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Indicates use of flame-resistant materials in construction.
In the battle of Fire Retardant Materials, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Fire Retardant Materials on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch Resistance
Is the surface scratch resistant?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
vs Scratch Resistance
Information on scratch resistance is not available for Anker 747, but Anker Prime explicitly features it, offering better protection against cosmetic wear.
Indicates whether the exterior surface is resistant to scratches from daily handling and transport.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Scratch Resistance on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Structural Reinforcement
Is there structural reinforcement?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Indicates added reinforcement for improved durability.
In the battle of Structural Reinforcement, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Structural Reinforcement on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Button Durability Rating
How durable are the buttons?
32 Anker 747 0Votes Good
67 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Very Good
vs Button Durability Rating
Anker 747 has a Good button durability rating, whereas Anker Prime boasts a Very Good rating, suggesting more robust and long-lasting physical controls.
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
In the battle of Button Durability Rating, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 35 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Button Durability Rating on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Port Reinforcement on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 747 does not have a remaining time display, but Anker Prime includes this feature, allowing users to see estimated charge remaining in hours and minutes.
Shows estimated remaining usage or charging time.
In the battle of Remaining Time Display, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Remaining Time Display on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Automatically enters sleep mode when idle to save power.
In the battle of Auto Sleep Feature, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Sleep Feature on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Display Type
What type of display does it have?
12 Anker 747 0Votes LED Indicator
17 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes LED Indicator
Anker 747
The power bank utilizes an LED Indicator as its display type, providing visual cues for status and battery level.
Anker Prime 27K
The power bank uses an LED Indicator display type, providing clear visual cues for battery status and charging activity.
Specifies the type of display used to show power information.
In the battle of Display Type, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Display Type on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Button Type
What type of button does it use?
22 Anker 747 0Votes Physical Button
27 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Physical Button
Describes the type of button used for control.
In the battle of Button Type, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Button Type on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Button Count
How many buttons are there?
17 Anker 747 0Votes 1
22 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes 1
Indicates the number of physical control buttons.
In the battle of Button Count, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Button Count on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Touch Control
Does it support touch controls?
No 0Votes Anker 747
No 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Indicates whether touch-based controls are supported.
In the battle of Touch Control, Anker 747 ◉ is same as Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Touch Control on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Wake Feature
Does it auto wake when a device is connected?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Automatically activates when a device is connected.
In the battle of Auto Wake Feature, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Wake Feature on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Alerts
What user alerts are available?
17 Anker 747 0Votes LED Light
60 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes LED Light, App Notification
vs User Feedback Alerts
Anker 747 provides user feedback through LED Light, while Anker Prime expands this with both LED Light and App Notification alerts, offering more comprehensive communication.
Indicates how the device provides user feedback and alerts.
In the battle of User Feedback Alerts, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 43 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the User Feedback Alerts on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
The power bank carries multiple safety certifications including UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS, ensuring compliance with international safety and environmental standards.
Lists recognized safety and compliance certifications.
In the battle of Safety Certification, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Safety Certification on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 747 does not list safety firmware, but Anker Prime explicitly states it has safety firmware, which enhances device security and reliability.
Uses firmware logic to manage and enforce safety rules.
In the battle of Safety Firmware, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Safety Firmware on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it include overvoltage protection?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Anker 747
Overvoltage protection is included, safeguarding connected devices from receiving an excessively high voltage that could cause damage.
Prevents voltage levels from exceeding safe limits.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overvoltage Protection on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection supported?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Protects devices from excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overcurrent Protection on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Protection
Does it have thermal protection?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Shuts down or limits power when overheating is detected.
In the battle of Thermal Protection, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Thermal Protection on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature monitored internally?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Continuously monitors internal temperature.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Temperature Monitoring on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Foreign Object Detection
Does it detect foreign objects?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Detects abnormal objects or unsafe connections.
In the battle of Foreign Object Detection, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Foreign Object Detection on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection
Is surge protection included?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Protects against sudden power surges.
In the battle of Surge Protection, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Surge Protection on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Electrostatic Discharge Protection
Does it protect against static discharge?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Protects internal circuits from static electricity.
In the battle of Electrostatic Discharge Protection, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Electrostatic Discharge Protection on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Protection Circuit
Does it include fire protection circuitry?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Includes circuitry designed to prevent fire hazards.
In the battle of Fire Protection Circuit, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Fire Protection Circuit on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Power Management
Does it use smart power management?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Dynamically manages power to maintain safe operation.
In the battle of Smart Power Management, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Smart Power Management on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Fail-Safe Shutdown
Does it have fail-safe shutdown?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
vs Fail-Safe Shutdown
Anker 747 does not specify a fail-safe shutdown feature, but Anker Prime explicitly includes it, providing an additional layer of protection.
Automatically shuts down under critical fault conditions.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Fail-Safe Shutdown on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Controls temperature while powering external devices.
In the battle of Discharge Temperature Regulation, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Discharge Temperature Regulation on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
32 Anker 747 0Votes Passive Cooling, Heat Spreader, Metal Chassis
37 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Passive Cooling, Heat Spreader
Anker Prime 27K
Heat dissipation is managed through Passive Cooling and a Heat Spreader, effectively drawing heat away from internal components to maintain optimal performance.
Describes how heat is dispersed away from internal components.
In the battle of Heat Dissipation Method, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heat Dissipation Method on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Heat Sink
Is there an internal heat sink?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Anker 747
An internal heat sink is integrated into the design, which helps dissipate heat generated during operation to maintain optimal performance.
Indicates the presence of an internal heat sink to absorb and spread heat.
In the battle of Internal Heat Sink, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Heat Sink on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Cutoff Threshold
At what temperature does it shut down?
158 °F 0Votes
158 °F 0Votes
Anker Prime 27K
The thermal cutoff threshold is set at 158 °F (70 °C), at which point the device will safely shut down to prevent damage from excessive heat.
Indicates the temperature at which the system shuts down to prevent damage.
In the battle of Thermal Cutoff Threshold, Anker 747 ◉ is same as Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering equal 158.00 °F measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Thermal Cutoff Threshold on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Spread Layer
Is there a heat spread layer?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Anker 747
The device incorporates a heat spread layer, designed to efficiently dissipate heat and maintain optimal operating temperatures.
Indicates the use of internal layers to evenly distribute heat.
In the battle of Heat Spread Layer, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heat Spread Layer on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Recovery Behavior
How does it recover from overheating?
62 Anker 747 0Votes Automatic Resume
67 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Automatic Resume
Anker Prime 27K
In case of overheating, the device features an Automatic Resume recovery behavior, allowing it to restart operation once safe temperatures are restored.
Defines how the system recovers after an overheat shutdown.
In the battle of Overheat Recovery Behavior, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overheat Recovery Behavior on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Management System
Does it have a thermal management system?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Indicates whether the power bank includes an integrated thermal management system.
In the battle of Thermal Management System, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Thermal Management System on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Throttling
Does it support thermal throttling?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Reduces power output automatically to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Thermal Throttling on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Temperature Control
Is surface temperature controlled?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Limits external surface temperature for safe handling.
In the battle of Surface Temperature Control, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Surface Temperature Control on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Temperature Regulation
Is charging temperature regulated?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Actively manages temperature during charging cycles.
In the battle of Charging Temperature Regulation, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charging Temperature Regulation on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 747 lacks app support, while Anker Prime offers it, providing users with enhanced control, monitoring, and customization options through a dedicated application.
Confirms whether a companion mobile app is available.
In the battle of App Support, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Based on community votes for App Support, Anker 747 ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Anker Prime 27K ◉, which got 1 votes.
App support is a game-changer for me. Being able to monitor and control the power bank from my phone is super convenient, which the Anker Prime offers.
Tracks connected device charging behavior and patterns.
In the battle of Device Usage Analytics, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Device Usage Analytics on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
vs Firmware Upgradable
Anker 747 does not support firmware upgradability, but Anker Prime does, meaning it can receive future updates for improved performance and new features.
Indicates whether firmware can be updated to improve functionality.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Firmware Upgradable on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Power Monitoring
Does it offer smart power monitoring?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Provides real-time monitoring of power flow and usage.
In the battle of Smart Power Monitoring, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Smart Power Monitoring on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Charging History Tracking
Is charging history tracked?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Records past charging sessions for review.
In the battle of Charging History Tracking, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charging History Tracking on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Remote Status Monitoring
Can status be monitored remotely?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Allows users to check power bank status remotely.
In the battle of Remote Status Monitoring, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Remote Status Monitoring on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Alerts
Are smart alerts available?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Sends alerts for battery status, faults, or charging completion.
In the battle of Smart Alerts, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Smart Alerts on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Automatically adjusts output to reduce energy waste.
In the battle of Automatic Power Optimization, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Automatic Power Optimization on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 747 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
80 Anker Prime 27K 0Votes Energy Star, EPEAT
vs Environmental Certification
Anker 747 does not list environmental certifications, while Anker Prime holds Energy Star and EPEAT certifications, highlighting its eco-friendly design and manufacturing.
Lists recognized environmental or sustainability certifications.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Environmental Certification on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Conversion Efficiency
What is the energy conversion efficiency?
90 % 0Votes
95 % 0Votes
vs Energy Conversion Efficiency
Anker 747 has an energy conversion efficiency of 90%, slightly less efficient than Anker Prime's 95%, indicating Anker Prime wastes less energy during conversion.
Measures how efficiently stored energy is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Energy Conversion Efficiency, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 5.0 % measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Energy Conversion Efficiency on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Power Consumption
How much power is used while idle?
0.2 Watt 0Votes
0.5 Watt 0Votes
Indicates how much power is consumed when the power bank is not actively charging devices.
In the battle of Idle Power Consumption, Anker 747 ◉ is better than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 0.3 Watt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Idle Power Consumption on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Eco Mode
Does it support eco mode?
No 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
vs Eco Mode
Anker 747 does not feature an Eco Mode, but Anker Prime includes it, providing users with an option to optimize energy consumption.
Enables reduced power usage to improve efficiency and battery longevity.
In the battle of Eco Mode, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Eco Mode on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 747 comes with an 18 Months warranty length, which is shorter than Anker Prime's more generous 24 Months warranty, offering extended customer assurance.
Indicates the duration of the manufacturer warranty.
In the battle of Warranty Length, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 10 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Warranty Length on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Technical Support Availability, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Technical Support Availability on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Warranty Coverage
Is the battery covered by warranty?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Anker 747
The product includes battery warranty coverage, providing assurance for the lifespan and performance of the internal battery cells.
Indicates whether the battery itself is covered under warranty.
In the battle of Battery Warranty Coverage, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Battery Warranty Coverage on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Policy
Is there a replacement policy?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Indicates eligibility for replacement in case of defects.
In the battle of Replacement Policy, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Replacement Policy on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Repair Service Availability
Are repair services available?
Yes 0Votes Anker 747
Yes 0Votes Anker Prime 27K
Confirms whether repair services are offered.
In the battle of Repair Service Availability, Anker 747 ◉ is worse than Anker Prime 27K ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Repair Service Availability on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Support Duration
How long is firmware support provided?
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 747 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
5 years 0Votes
Indicates how long the manufacturer provides firmware updates and software support.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Firmware Support Duration on Anker 747 ◉ vs Anker Prime 27K ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed Performance
How fast does this power bank recharge devices in everyday use?
Ultra fast charging — Under 1.5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1.5 to 3 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate charging — 3 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 5 to 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Capacity Satisfaction
How satisfied are you with the battery capacity of this power bank for daily needs?
Massive capacity for multiple days — Over 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Very high capacity — 20000 to 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Solid everyday capacity — 10000 to 19999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Limited capacity — 5000 to 9999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Barely useful capacity — Under 5000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Output Power and Device Support
How well does this power bank handle charging different devices at once?
Handles everything with ease — 100 W or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong multi device support — 60 to 99 W
0Votes
0Votes
Good for phones and tablets — 30 to 59 W
0Votes
0Votes
Basic output only — 15 to 29 W
0Votes
0Votes
Struggles with most devices — Under 15 W
0Votes
0Votes
Port Selection and Flexibility
How flexible is this power bank when it comes to charging ports?
Covers all modern needs — USB C and USB A with fast charge
0Votes
0Votes
Very versatile — Multiple USB C and USB A ports
0Votes
0Votes
Good variety — USB C and USB A basic support
0Votes
0Votes
Limited options — Single USB C or USB A port
0Votes
0Votes
Very restrictive — One slow USB port only
0Votes
0Votes
Size and Portability
How easy is this power bank to carry around daily?
Pocket friendly and lightweight — Under 8 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Easy to carry — 8 to 12 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Manageable but noticeable — 12 to 18 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Bulky for daily carry — 18 to 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Too heavy to carry around — Over 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Build Quality and Durability
How durable does this power bank feel during regular use?
Feels extremely solid and long lasting — Over 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Very durable — 3 to 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Decent build quality — 2 to 3 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Feels fragile — 1 to 2 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap and unreliable — Under 1 year expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging output from this power bank during use?
Rock solid with no drops — Voltage variation under 3 percent
0Votes
0Votes
Very stable — 3 to 5 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Mostly stable — 5 to 8 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Occasional drops — 8 to 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Unstable charging — Over 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Heat and Safety Performance
How well does this power bank control heat during charging and heavy use?
Stays cool and safe — Under 95 F
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly warm but comfortable — 95 to 104 F
0Votes
0Votes
Warm but acceptable — 104 to 113 F
0Votes
0Votes
Gets quite hot — 113 to 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot and concerning — Over 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Efficiency
How efficiently does this power bank convert stored energy into usable charging power?
Highly efficient with minimal loss — Over 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Very efficient — 85 to 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Decent efficiency — 75 to 84 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeable energy loss — 65 to 74 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Poor efficiency — Under 65 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Travel Friendliness
How convenient is this power bank for travel and daily commuting?
Perfect for travel and flights — No airline issues
0Votes
0Votes
Very travel friendly — Easy to pack and carry
0Votes
0Votes
Fine for occasional travel — Manageable size and weight
0Votes
0Votes
Awkward to carry on trips — Bulky or heavy
0Votes
0Votes
Not suitable for travel — Restricted or impractical
Supermod 
Moderator 
Recaptor 
0 Cartling 
